Il sab, 2002-02-16 alle 20:26, Martin Devera ha scritto: > Mario, > First I thank you all for your precious support! In diffserv mailing list there is less help! > I looked at the conf. First don't use prio 4 - it is the same as > prio 3 (htb does prios 0..3). Ok I have corrected it. > How do you measure the latency ? Ping ? How big packet, which ip > is pinged ? You use prio and other schedulers on ppp ... Goes the > ping packet through them ? Sure testing is difficult. Please note that I have tried different configurations and not only the one I posted: sfq vs red, htb vs prio etc. etc. etc. > Did you tested for sure that packets are enqueued into right > class (tc -s class show dev eth0) ? > Unfortunately tc command shows to me that packets are in right class. > If it could be htb problem I'm ready to look at it (although I've > been solving almost ten reports like this and only first two were > really htb bugs - other was mainly bad setup, bad expectations or > bad measuring). > I don't want to be alibistic only I'm short of time as I work in new > htb algorithm ;) > No, I do not want to accuse you of a bug. I have asked only because I do not want to spend a month on various tests and THEN discover that there is a KNOWN bug in htb. I rememeber when I had to implement diffserv with cbq for my teacher. I had to cheat a lot because cqb parameters do not do what they mean. If you say htb is stable I am happy. Please continue developing new algorithms ;-)
