[LARTC] Queries

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi all,
hi stef,

stef i went thru the site www.docum.org & would really like to thank u
on one part--->monitor.pl.. :-).. havent tried it yestreday but will
today when i find time but reading it i know that ... :-)
1) comming accros 2 one of the pages -->
www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/cbq/splitting/weight/splitting-weight.html
..i saw these 4 lines & got curious 2know y ur sending pkts with mark of
1 & 2 to both classes 10:2 & 20:10 ?..wont there b confusion 2 what
rules 2b applied?
tc filter add $DEV parent 10: protocol ip prio 3 handle 1 fw classid
10:2
tc filter add $DEV parent 10: protocol ip prio 3 handle 2 fw classid
10:2
tc filter add $DEV parent 20: protocol ip prio 3 handle 1 fw classid
20:10
tc filter add $DEV parent 20: protocol ip prio 3 handle 2 fw classid
20:20

2) our linux box does managemnt of public lan(office ) & pvt
lan(cable)--by ip's.. sucess with public ips, marking & using tc filter
is sucessful but not true with pvt ips (10 series, marking part!).. to
let u know better here is what we did with public ip..
 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -s <a.b.c.0/26> -d
<a.b.e.0/25> -j MARK --set-mark 90
 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d <a.b.c.0/26> -s
<a.b.e.0/25> -j MARK --set-mark 91
 the tc commands
 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:105 pfifo limit 2
 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:105 pfifo limit 2
This works fine--tested with different traffic loads of download&
upload.
BUT with lan on eth4 which has pvt ip range(10series) vr not sucesful.
the problem is how to make sure that the pkts detination for 10.0.0.0/8
should be marked as they r MASQUERADEd. so i trired to mark with
FORWARD/OUTPUT/POSTROUTING but unsuccesful. tc -s class.... etc command
doesnt show any data being passed thru the class while iptables -nvL -t
mangle shows pkts r being marked & passing thru.

3) do we need to reset/restart the iptables script when iproute script
is reapplied or vice versa ?

4) have any one of you faced this problem --> when allowing a network
segment to INPUT/FORWARD/MASQUERADE thru, the ip's/pc's show eractic
behaviour of performance..for eg allwoing 10.20.30.0/28 & restructing it
to say 64 kbps will allow one ip/pc to utlise the bandidth while other
ip/pc struggle to get an equal share. this have been monitored for
hours/days with iptraf. 
how can one insure that a few ip's being used on that perticular network
segment at any perticulr time, all ip get equal share of bandwith
alloted to that network segmenet--well if not equal a fair share of
bandwidth alloted !!

pls pardon me 4 my english.
thanx in advance

arindam haldar


-- 
Arindam Haldar
Systems & Network
Digital 2 Virtual ISP Pvt Ltd.
Vadodara, Gujarat  INDIA
www.d2visp.com


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux