On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 16:09 -0500, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 18.11.2013, at 03:34, “tiejun.chen” <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/23/2013 09:26 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote: > >> We enter with interrupts disabled in hardware, but we need to > >> call RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE anyway to ensure that the software state > >> is kept in sync instead of calling hard_irq_disable() directly. > > Why didn't this happen before? What is this patch fixing? It's cleanup, not a fix. It makes things more consistent with other 64-bit kernel entry code. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
