Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc: kvm: fix rare but potential deadlock scene

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18.11.2013, at 16:32, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On 16.11.2013, at 01:55, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 04:35:00PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>> Since kvmppc_hv_find_lock_hpte() is called from both virtmode and
>>> realmode, so it can trigger the deadlock.
>>> 
>>> Suppose the following scene:
>>> 
>>> Two physical cpuM, cpuN, two VM instances A, B, each VM has a group of
>>> vcpus.
>>> 
>>> If on cpuM, vcpu_A_1 holds bitlock X (HPTE_V_HVLOCK), then is switched
>>> out, and on cpuN, vcpu_A_2 try to lock X in realmode, then cpuN will be
>>> caught in realmode for a long time.
>>> 
>>> What makes things even worse if the following happens,
>>> On cpuM, bitlockX is hold, on cpuN, Y is hold.
>>> vcpu_B_2 try to lock Y on cpuM in realmode
>>> vcpu_A_2 try to lock X on cpuN in realmode
>>> 
>>> Oops! deadlock happens
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks, applied to kvm-ppc-queue.

Actually, I've changed my mind and moved the patch to the for-3.13 branch instead. Please make sure to CC kvm@vger on all patches you submit though.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux