On 2013-08-15 10:20, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2013-08-15 10:09, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 2013-08-15 09:51, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On 2013-08-13 17:56, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote: >>>>>>> Add test cases for I/O bitmaps, including corner cases. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would be good to briefly list the corner cases here. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arthur Chunqi Li <yzt356@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> x86/vmx.h | 6 +- >>>>>>> x86/vmx_tests.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> 2 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/x86/vmx.h b/x86/vmx.h >>>>>>> index 18961f1..dba8b20 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/x86/vmx.h >>>>>>> +++ b/x86/vmx.h >>>>>>> @@ -417,15 +417,15 @@ enum Ctrl1 { >>>>>>> "popf\n\t" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_SIZE_MASK 0x7 >>>>>>> -#define _VMX_IO_BYTE 1 >>>>>>> -#define _VMX_IO_WORD 2 >>>>>>> +#define _VMX_IO_BYTE 0 >>>>>>> +#define _VMX_IO_WORD 1 >>>>>>> #define _VMX_IO_LONG 3 >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_DIRECTION_MASK (1ul << 3) >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_IN (1ul << 3) >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_OUT 0 >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_STRING (1ul << 4) >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_REP (1ul << 5) >>>>>>> -#define VMX_IO_OPRAND_DX (1ul << 6) >>>>>>> +#define VMX_IO_OPRAND_IMM (1ul << 6) >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_PORT_MASK 0xFFFF0000 >>>>>>> #define VMX_IO_PORT_SHIFT 16 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/x86/vmx_tests.c b/x86/vmx_tests.c >>>>>>> index 44be3f4..ad28c4c 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/x86/vmx_tests.c >>>>>>> +++ b/x86/vmx_tests.c >>>>>>> @@ -2,10 +2,13 @@ >>>>>>> #include "msr.h" >>>>>>> #include "processor.h" >>>>>>> #include "vm.h" >>>>>>> +#include "io.h" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> u64 ia32_pat; >>>>>>> u64 ia32_efer; >>>>>>> u32 stage; >>>>>>> +void *io_bitmap_a, *io_bitmap_b; >>>>>>> +u16 ioport; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> static inline void vmcall() >>>>>>> { >>>>>>> @@ -473,6 +476,168 @@ static int cr_shadowing_exit_handler() >>>>>>> return VMX_TEST_VMEXIT; >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +static void iobmp_init() >>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>> + u32 ctrl_cpu0; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + io_bitmap_a = alloc_page(); >>>>>>> + io_bitmap_a = alloc_page(); >>>>>>> + memset(io_bitmap_a, 0x0, PAGE_SIZE); >>>>>>> + memset(io_bitmap_b, 0x0, PAGE_SIZE); >>>>>>> + ctrl_cpu0 = vmcs_read(CPU_EXEC_CTRL0); >>>>>>> + ctrl_cpu0 |= CPU_IO_BITMAP; >>>>>>> + ctrl_cpu0 &= (~CPU_IO); >>>>>>> + vmcs_write(CPU_EXEC_CTRL0, ctrl_cpu0); >>>>>>> + vmcs_write(IO_BITMAP_A, (u64)io_bitmap_a); >>>>>>> + vmcs_write(IO_BITMAP_B, (u64)io_bitmap_b); >>>>>>> +} >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +static void iobmp_main() >>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>> +/* >>>>>>> + data = (u8 *)io_bitmap_b; >>>>>>> + ioport = 0xffff; >>>>>>> + data[(ioport - 0x8000) /8] |= (1 << (ioport % 8)); >>>>>>> + inb(ioport); >>>>>>> + outb(0, ioport); >>>>>>> +*/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Forgotten debug code? >>>>>> >>>>>>> + // stage 0, test IO pass >>>>>>> + set_stage(0); >>>>>>> + inb(0x5000); >>>>>>> + outb(0x0, 0x5000); >>>>>>> + if (stage != 0) >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - I/O pass", 0); >>>>>>> + else >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - I/O pass", 1); >>>>>>> + // test IO width, in/out >>>>>>> + ((u8 *)io_bitmap_a)[0] = 0xFF; >>>>>>> + set_stage(2); >>>>>>> + inb(0x0); >>>>>>> + if (stage != 3) >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - trap in", 0); >>>>>>> + else >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - trap in", 1); >>>>>>> + set_stage(3); >>>>>>> + outw(0x0, 0x0); >>>>>>> + if (stage != 4) >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - trap out", 0); >>>>>>> + else >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - trap out", 1); >>>>>>> + set_stage(4); >>>>>>> + inl(0x0); >>>>>> >>>>>> Forgot to check the progress? >>>>>> >>>>>>> + // test low/high IO port >>>>>>> + set_stage(5); >>>>>>> + ((u8 *)io_bitmap_a)[0x5000 / 8] = (1 << (0x5000 % 8)); >>>>>>> + inb(0x5000); >>>>>>> + if (stage == 6) >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - I/O port, low part", 1); >>>>>>> + else >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - I/O port, low part", 0); >>>>>>> + set_stage(6); >>>>>>> + ((u8 *)io_bitmap_b)[0x1000 / 8] = (1 << (0x1000 % 8)); >>>>>>> + inb(0x9000); >>>>>>> + if (stage == 7) >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - I/O port, high part", 1); >>>>>>> + else >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - I/O port, high part", 0); >>>>>>> + // test partial pass >>>>>>> + set_stage(7); >>>>>>> + inl(0x4FFF); >>>>>>> + if (stage == 8) >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - partial pass", 1); >>>>>>> + else >>>>>>> + report("I/O bitmap - partial pass", 0); >>>>>>> + // test overrun >>>>>>> + set_stage(8); >>>>>>> + memset(io_bitmap_b, 0xFF, PAGE_SIZE); >>>>>>> + inl(0xFFFF); >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's check the expected stage also here. >>>>> The check is below "if (stage == 9)", the following "memset" is just >>>>> used to prevent I/O mask to printf. >>>> >>>> Right, there is an i/o instruction missing below after the second memset >>>> - or I cannot follow what you are trying to test. The above inl would >>>> always trigger, independent of the wrap-around. Only if you clear both >>>> bitmaps, we get to the "interesting" scenario. So something is still >>>> wrong here, no? >>> Yes, we need to memset io_bit_map_a to 0 here. The above inl and the >>> test "if (stage == 9)" are cooperatively used to test I/O overrun: >>> test 4 bits width "in" to 0xFFFF. >> >> The point is that, according to our understanding of the SDM, we should >> even see a trap in this wrap-around scenario if both bitmaps are cleared. > Well, yep. I get the same understanding when I had first glance at > SDM, but currently IO will pass if every bits cleared. This is the > only pending problem that I asked Paolo and Gleb in a previous mail > thread, and they are both too busy as you told me and no response > until now :) That is strange when looking at kvm: static bool nested_vmx_exit_handled_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) ... if (port < 0x8000) bitmap = vmcs12->io_bitmap_a; else if (port < 0x10000) bitmap = vmcs12->io_bitmap_b; else return 1; Are you testing with kvm.git next? Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature