Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-07-02 17:15, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2013-07-02 15:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >>>> Since this series is pending in mail list for long time. And it's really a big feature for Nested. Also, I doubt the original authors(Jun and Nahav)should not have enough time to continue it. So I will pick it up. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> See comments below:
> >>>>
> >>>> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-05-20:
> >>>>> Il 19/05/2013 06:52, Jun Nakajima ha scritto:
> >>>>>> From: Nadav Har'El <nyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Recent KVM, since
> >>>>> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kvm/2010/5/2/6261577
> >>>>>> switch the EFER MSR when EPT is used and the host and guest have different
> >>>>>> NX bits. So if we add support for nested EPT (L1 guest using EPT to run L2)
> >>>>>> and want to be able to run recent KVM as L1, we need to allow L1 to use this
> >>>>>> EFER switching feature.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To do this EFER switching, KVM uses VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER if
> >>>>> available,
> >>>>>> and if it isn't, it uses the generic VM_ENTRY/EXIT_MSR_LOAD. This patch adds
> >>>>>> support for the former (the latter is still unsupported).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nested entry and exit emulation (prepare_vmcs_02 and
> >>>>> load_vmcs12_host_state,
> >>>>>> respectively) already handled VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER correctly. So
> >>>>> all
> >>>>>> that's left to do in this patch is to properly advertise this feature to L1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note that vmcs12's VM_ENTRY/EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER are emulated by L0, by
> >>>>> using
> >>>>>> vmx_set_efer (which itself sets one of several vmcs02 fields), so we always
> >>>>>> support this feature, regardless of whether the host supports it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xinhao Xu <xinhao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >>>>>> index 260a919..fb9cae5 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >>>>>> @@ -2192,7 +2192,8 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
> >>>>>>  #else
> >>>>>>  	nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high = 0;
> >>>>>>  #endif
> >>>>>> -	nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high |=
> >>>>> VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
> >>>>>> +	nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high |=
> >>>>> (VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR |
> >>>>>> +				      VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  	/* entry controls */
> >>>>>>  	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS,
> >>>>>> @@ -2201,8 +2202,8 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
> >>>>>>  	nested_vmx_entry_ctls_low =
> >>>>> VM_ENTRY_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
> >>>>>>  	nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high &=
> >>>>>>  		VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PAT | VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE;
> >>>>>> -	nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high |=
> >>>>> VM_ENTRY_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> +	nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high |=
> >>>>> (VM_ENTRY_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR |
> >>>>>> +				       VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER);
> >>>>>>  	/* cpu-based controls */
> >>>>>>  	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS,
> >>>>>>  		nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low, nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high);
> >>>>>> @@ -7492,10 +7493,18 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>>>> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> >>>>>>  	vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits &= ~vmcs12->cr0_guest_host_mask;
> >>>>>>  	vmcs_writel(CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK,
> >>>>> ~vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -	/* Note: IA32_MODE, LOAD_IA32_EFER are modified by vmx_set_efer
> >>>>> below */
> >>>>>> -	vmcs_write32(VM_EXIT_CONTROLS,
> >>>>>> -		vmcs12->vm_exit_controls | vmcs_config.vmexit_ctrl);
> >>>>>> -	vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS, vmcs12->vm_entry_controls |
> >>>>>> +	/* L2->L1 exit controls are emulated - the hardware exit is to L0 so
> >>>>>> +	 * we should use its exit controls. Note that IA32_MODE, LOAD_IA32_EFER
> >>>>>> +	 * bits are further modified by vmx_set_efer() below.
> >>>>>> +	 */
> >>>>>> +	vmcs_write32(VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, vmcs_config.vmexit_ctrl);
> >>>> This is wrong. We cannot use L0 exit control directly.
> >>>> LOAD_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, LOAD_HOST_EFE, LOAD_HOST_PAT, ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT should use host's exit control. But others, still need use (vmcs12|host).
> >>>>
> >>> I do not see why. We always intercept DR7/PAT/EFER, so save is emulated
> >>> too. Host address space size always come from L0 and preemption timer is
> >>> not supported for nested IIRC and when it will be host will have to save
> >>> it on exit anyway for correct emulation.
> >>
> >> Preemption timer is already supported and works fine as far as I tested.
> >> KVM doesn't use it for L1, so we do not need to save/restore it - IIRC.
> >>
> > So what happens if L1 configures it to value X after X/2 ticks L0 exit
> > happen and L0 gets back to L2 directly. The counter will be X again
> > instead of X/2.
> 
> Likely. Yes, we need to improve our emulation by setting "Save
> VMX-preemption timer value" or emulate this in software if the hardware
> lacks support for it (was this flag introduced after the preemption
> timer itself?).
> 
Not sure, but my point was that for correct emulation host needs to set
 "save preempt timer on vmexit" anyway so all VM_EXIT_CONTROLS are
indeed emulated as far as I see.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux