Il 10/06/2013 21:52, Scott Wood ha scritto: > On 06/09/2013 03:09:21 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:16:28PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >> > Most of these have been posted before, but I grouped them together as >> > there are some contextual dependencies between them. >> > >> > Gleb/Paolo: As Alex doesn't appear to be back yet, can you apply these >> > if there's no objection over the next few days? >> > >> Well we are at -rc5 now and Linus specifically said that if he sees one >> more "cleanup" he will be less then happy [1]. Looks like this patch >> series does have some cleanups that can be postponed to 3.11. >> Patches 1-4,7 looks like 3.10 material to me. 5 and 6 a cleanups that can >> wait for 3.11. Not sure about 8, if 8 fixes serious problem please >> specify it in the commit message. > > Agreed. > > 8 did fix a BUG_ON before patch 7 came along, but now it looks > non-critical. > > 5 only affects IRQ tracing, and it's not a regression, so also probably > not critical. I'll resend patch 7 so that it applies without needing > patch 5. > > 6 is mainly doing things that we originally thought were a fix to lazy > ee handling, until we noticed code elsewhere handling it in a hackier > way. There's still a bugfix in that previously kvm_guest_exit() was > called in the wrong place which could occasionally mess up virtual time > accounting, but that's also not a regression and not critical. CCed people probably already know, but in any case patches 1-4 are already in Linus's tree (commit af180b81). Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
