On 06/09/2013 03:09:21 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:16:28PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Most of these have been posted before, but I grouped them together
as
> there are some contextual dependencies between them.
>
> Gleb/Paolo: As Alex doesn't appear to be back yet, can you apply
these
> if there's no objection over the next few days?
>
Well we are at -rc5 now and Linus specifically said that if he sees
one
more "cleanup" he will be less then happy [1]. Looks like this patch
series does have some cleanups that can be postponed to 3.11.
Patches 1-4,7 looks like 3.10 material to me. 5 and 6 a cleanups that
can
wait for 3.11. Not sure about 8, if 8 fixes serious problem please
specify it in the commit message.
Agreed.
8 did fix a BUG_ON before patch 7 came along, but now it looks
non-critical.
5 only affects IRQ tracing, and it's not a regression, so also probably
not critical. I'll resend patch 7 so that it applies without needing
patch 5.
6 is mainly doing things that we originally thought were a fix to lazy
ee handling, until we noticed code elsewhere handling it in a hackier
way. There's still a bugfix in that previously kvm_guest_exit() was
called in the wrong place which could occasionally mess up virtual time
accounting, but that's also not a regression and not critical.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
