Jordan Justen <jljusten@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In terms of creating a FAT module, the most likely source would seem to >> be the kernel code and since that's GPL, I don't think it's terribly >> avoidable to end up with a GPL'd uefi implementation. > > Why would OpenBSD not be a potential source? > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/msdosfs/ If someone is going to do it, that's fine. But if me, it's going to be a GPL base. Actually, enabling GPL contributions to OVMF is a major motivating factor for me in this whole discussion. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > We have a half-done ext2 fs from GSoC2011 that started with OpenBSD. > > https://github.com/the-ridikulus-rat/Tianocore_Ext2Pkg > >> If that's inevitable, then we're wasting effort by rewriting stuff under >> a BSD license. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
