On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In terms of creating a FAT module, the most likely source would seem to > be the kernel code and since that's GPL, I don't think it's terribly > avoidable to end up with a GPL'd uefi implementation. Why would OpenBSD not be a potential source? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/msdosfs/ We have a half-done ext2 fs from GSoC2011 that started with OpenBSD. https://github.com/the-ridikulus-rat/Tianocore_Ext2Pkg > If that's inevitable, then we're wasting effort by rewriting stuff under > a BSD license. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
