On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:12:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:17:38PM -0700, Andrew Honig wrote: > > kvm_write_guest would work, but it will hurt performance a bit because > > it'll be doing the address translation each time the time is updated, > > which happens on most guest enters. > > > Time updates are rare, so this should no be an issue. Marcelo? Yes, performance is not an issue at this level. > > Another possibility would be to change kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init to > > accept a size parameter. If the requested range is all on one page > > then it operates the same as it currently does. If the address range > > is on more than one page then it falls back to kvm_write_guest. This > > preserves the good performance for all cases that currently work, > > while still supporting the unlikely case of page straddling requests. > > It also makes it harder to write a security bugs for other callers of > > kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init by explicitly requiring a size parameter. > > > > I can write a patch if you like the idea. > Nice idea. Send a patch please. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
