On 03/13/2013 08:33 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:42:18PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> On 03/13/2013 03:28 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: >>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:06:23 +0800 >>> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/12/2013 04:44 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: >>>>> This will be used not to zap unrelated mmu pages when creating/moving >>>>> a memory slot later. >>>> >>>> How about save all mmio spte into a mmio-rmap? >>> >>> The problem is that other mmu code would need to care about the pointers >>> stored in the new rmap list: when mmu_shrink zaps shadow pages for example. >> >> It is not hard... all the codes have been wrapped by *zap_spte*. >> > So are you going to send a patch? What do you think about applying this > as temporary solution? Hi Gleb, Since it only needs small change based on this patch, I think we can directly apply the rmap-based way. Takuya, could you please do this? ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
