On 2013-03-12 13:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/03/2013 13:06, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>>> @@ -6178,7 +6177,13 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state)
>>> {
>>> - vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
>>> + if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
>>> + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
>>> + set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
>>> + } else
>>> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
>>
>> Should INIT_RECEIVED also be invalid without an in-kernel LAPIC?
>
> And since migration was brought up yesterday, do we need an interface to
> retrieve and set this?
>
> And should KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS use the new sipi_vector in the APIC
> rather than the old one?
I hope not. The idea is that the APIC events are processed before the
migration completes. Translating events on get_mpstate should ensure this.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
