Il 12/03/2013 13:06, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> > @@ -6178,7 +6177,13 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state)
> > {
> > - vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
> > + if (mp_state->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
> > + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> > + set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
> > + } else
> > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = mp_state->mp_state;
>
> Should INIT_RECEIVED also be invalid without an in-kernel LAPIC?
And since migration was brought up yesterday, do we need an interface to
retrieve and set this?
And should KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS use the new sipi_vector in the APIC
rather than the old one?
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
