Re: TCP small packets throughput and multiqueue virtio-net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Well, the point is : if your app does write(1024) bytes, thats probably
because it wants small packets from the very beginning. (See the TCP
PUSH flag ?)

I think that raises the question of whether or not Jason was setting the test-specific -D option on his TCP_STREAM tests, to have netperf make a setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY) call.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones

If the transport is slow, TCP stack will automatically collapse several
write into single skbs (assuming TSO or GSO is on), and you'll see big
GSO packets with tcpdump [1]. So TCP will help you to get less overhead
in this case.

But if transport is fast, you'll see small packets, and thats good for
latency.

So my opinion is : its exactly behaving as expected.

If you want bigger packets either :
- Make the application doing big write()
- Slow the vmexit ;)

[1] GSO fools tcpdump : Actual packets sent to the wire are not 'big
packets', but they hit dev_hard_start_xmit() as GSO packets.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux