On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:27:32PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/03/2012 10:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On 08/29/2012 11:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I don't see a point in making contributors avoid non-problems that might > >>>> conceivably become trivial problems some day. Especially when there's > >>>> no automated help with the avoiding. > >>> > >>> -Wpointer-arith > >> > >> +1 > > > > FWIW, I'm not in favour of enabling it, just pointing out that it > > exists. In general I prefer avoiding unnecessary use of extensions, but > > in this case the extension is trivial and improves readability. > > Void pointers are not so type safe as uint8_t pointers. casts are even worse. > There's also > little difference in readability between those in my opinion. here too, casts are worse for readability. > > > > > > -- > > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
