Re: [PATCHv5 4/4] KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/30/2012 05:38 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Optimize "rep ins" by allowing emulator to write back more than one
> datum at a time. Introduce new operand type OP_MEM_STR which tells
> writeback() that dst contains pointer to an array that should be written
> back as opposite to just one data element.
> 
>  
>  	if (ctxt->rep_prefix && (ctxt->d & String)) {
> +		unsigned int count;
>  		struct read_cache *r = &ctxt->io_read;
> -		register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX], -1);
> +		if ((ctxt->d & SrcMask) == SrcSI)
> +			count = ctxt->src.count;
> +		else
> +			count = ctxt->dst.count;
> +		register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX],
> +				-count);
>  

count is unsigned.  Does it sign extend correctly in
register_address_increment()?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux