Re: [PATCH 1/5] qom: adopt rwlock to protect accessing dev from removing it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 04:14 PM, liu ping fan wrote:
>>>
>>> From the description above, I don't see why it can't be a mutex.
>>>
>> Searching in the device tree (or MemoryRegion view) can be often in
>> parallel, especially in mmio-dispatch code path
>
> In mmio dispatch we have a pointer to the object, we don't need to
> search anything.  Is device tree search a hot path?
>
I think, we need lock to protect searching --phys_page_find()  from
deleter--DeviceClass:unmap,  so rwlock?
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux