On 07/26/2012 03:56 PM, liu ping fan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Il 25/07/2012 05:31, Liu Ping Fan ha scritto: >>> From: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> rwlock: >>> qemu_device_tree_mutex >>> >>> rd side: >>> --device_del(destruction of device will be postphoned until unplug >>> ack from guest), >>> --pci hot-unplug >>> --iteration (qdev_reset_all) >>> >>> wr side: >>> --device_add >>> >> >> This is not defined anywhere, is a piece missing in the patch? >> > Oh, yes, I miss the patch. In that patch, these rwlock are just place holder. > I see there is already try to implement rwlock for qemu. > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-10/msg00192.html > and is it the time for introduce rwlock for qemu? >From the description above, I don't see why it can't be a mutex. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
