On 23 July 2012 15:30, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But I was only joking. Nested virtualization is interesting technically > but so far I haven't seen any huge or even small uptake. Yes; that (as I understand it) is why it wasn't an expected use case for the architecture extensions. The other related thing that might be surprising for x86-background people is that being able to present the guest with a virtual CPU that looks like a pre-virtualization CPU (eg the A9) isn't really an intended use case either. (The ARM world has much less of the 'everything must be fully backwards compatible for existing OSes' than x86...) -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
