Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] kvm PLE handler: Choose better candidate for directed yield

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/11/2012 02:20 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

* Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1595,6 +1595,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
  				continue;
  			if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq))
  				continue;
+			if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_check_and_update_eligible(vcpu)) {
+				continue;
+			}

Saw this fly by for a second time and now it annoyed me enough
to mention it: those curly braces are superfluous and should be
dropped.


Oops! Sorry.will remove {} and resend with Rik's reviewed-by. TBH,
block got simplified after iterations (local), this one leftout. my
mistake.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux