Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] kvm PLE handler: Choose better candidate for directed yield

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1595,6 +1595,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
>  				continue;
>  			if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq))
>  				continue;
> +			if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_check_and_update_eligible(vcpu)) {
> +				continue;
> +			}

Saw this fly by for a second time and now it annoyed me enough 
to mention it: those curly braces are superfluous and should be 
dropped.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux