On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:34:31AM +0800, Guo Chao wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index f48cef3..7593693 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -5880,7 +5880,7 @@ static int vmx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > return handle_invalid_guest_state(vcpu); > > /* > - * the KVM_REQ_EVENT optimization bit is only on for one entry, and if > + * The KVM_REQ_EVENT optimization bit is only on for one entry, and if > * we did not inject a still-pending event to L1 now because of > * nested_run_pending, we need to re-enable this bit. > */ There is no rule about comments in code starting with uppercase. Patches to correct spelling would be accepted. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
