Re: [net-next RFC V4 PATCH 0/4] Multiqueue virtio-net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/25/2012 2:16 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
Hello All:

This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on
Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the
packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments.

Test Environment:
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes
- Two directed connected 82599

Test Summary:

- Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR test
- Lowlights: regression on small packet transmission, higher cpu utilization
              than single queue, need further optimization
Does this also scale with increased number of VMs?

Thanks
Sridhar

Analysis of the performance result:

- I count the number of packets sending/receiving during the test, and
   multiqueue show much more ability in terms of packets per second.

- For the tx regression, multiqueue send about 1-2 times of more packets
   compared to single queue, and the packets size were much smaller than single
   queue does. I suspect tcp does less batching in multiqueue, so I hack the
   tcp_write_xmit() to forece more batching, multiqueue works as well as
   singlequeue for both small transmission and throughput

- I didn't pack the accelerate RFS with virtio-net in this sereis as it still
   need further shaping, for the one that interested in this please see:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg64111.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux