Re: [net-next RFC V4 PATCH 0/4] Multiqueue virtio-net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/25/2012 3:07 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:16:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Hello All:

This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on
Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the
packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments.

Test Environment:
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes
- Two directed connected 82599

Test Summary:

- Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR test
- Lowlights: regression on small packet transmission, higher cpu utilization
              than single queue, need further optimization

Didn't review yet, reacting this this paragraph:

To avoid regressions, it seems reasonable to make
the device use a single queue by default for now.
Add a way to switch multiqueue on/off using ethtool.

This way guest admin can tune the device for the
workload manually until we manage to imlement some
self-tuning heuristics.


Ethtool already has this switch 'ethtool -L' can be
used to set the number tx/rx channels. So you would
likely just need to add a set_channels hook.

.John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux