Hi, Avi What's your opinion of this patch? Thanks, -Xudong > -----Original Message----- > From: kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Hao, Xudong > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 9:10 AM > To: avi@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Xiantao > Subject: RE: [PATCH] KVM: change PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT to avoid > conflict with EPT Dirty bit > > Hi, Avi > > Do you have comments for this patch? > > Thanks, > -Xudong > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hao, Xudong > > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 6:26 PM > > To: avi@xxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hao, Xudong; Zhang, Xiantao > > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: change PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT to avoid conflict > > with EPT Dirty bit > > > > EPT Dirty bit use bit 9 as Intel SDM definition, to avoid conflict, change > > PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT to 10. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > > index 24dd43d..f5b996a 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644); > > > > #define PTE_PREFETCH_NUM 8 > > > > -#define PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 9 > > +#define PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 10 > > #define PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 52 > > > > #define PT64_LEVEL_BITS 9 > > -- > > 1.5.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
