On 06/08/2012 05:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> >> Pls correct me if I'm wrong. > > Well, IIRC, the "don't loop over all vcpus with IRQs or preemption > disabled" was one argument against direct legacy interrupt injection as > well. That's what I kept in mind from those discussions. Maybe Avi can > comment on the current position. It's still my position. IMO we need something like struct gfn_to_hva_cache for interrupts. If it's in the cache, we fast-path it from the interrupt handler. If not, fall back to a workqueue and let it refill the cache. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
