On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:54:42PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:54:56PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > We perform ISR lookups twice: during interrupt > > injection and on EOI. Typical workloads only have > > a single bit set there. So we can avoid ISR scans by > > 1. counting bits as we set/clear them in ISR > > 2. if count is 1, caching the vector number > > 3. if count != 1, invalidating the cache > > > > The real purpose of this is enabling PV EOI > > which needs to quickly validate the vector. > > But non PV guests might also benefit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > I am well aware of Thomas and Peter's suggestion of reworking APIC > > register handling in kvm instead of adding a cache like this patch does. > > > > This revision does *not* address that comment yet: it only corrects a > > bug in the original patch. > > > > Posting in this form for ease of testing. > > > > Changes from v1: > > replace ASSERT by BUG_ON, correcting inverted logic > > > > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 + > > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c > > index 93c1574..0d2985d 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c > > @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ static inline void apic_clear_vector(int vec, void *bitmap) > > clear_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec)); > > } > > > > +static inline int __apic_test_and_set_vector(int vec, void *bitmap) > > +{ > > + return __test_and_set_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec)); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int __apic_test_and_clear_vector(int vec, void *bitmap) > > +{ > > + return __test_and_clear_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec)); > > +} > > + > > static inline int apic_hw_enabled(struct kvm_lapic *apic) > > { > > return (apic)->vcpu->arch.apic_base & MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE; > > @@ -210,6 +220,16 @@ static int find_highest_vector(void *bitmap) > > return fls(word[word_offset << 2]) - 1 + (word_offset << 5); > > } > > > > +static u8 count_vectors(void *bitmap) > > +{ > > + u32 *word = bitmap; > > + int word_offset; > > + u8 count = 0; > > + for (word_offset = 0; word_offset < MAX_APIC_VECTOR >> 5; ++word_offset) > > + count += hweight32(word[word_offset << 2]); > > + return count; > > +} > > + > > static inline int apic_test_and_set_irr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic) > > { > > apic->irr_pending = true; > > @@ -242,6 +262,25 @@ static inline void apic_clear_irr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic) > > apic->irr_pending = true; > > } > > > > +static inline void apic_set_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic) > > +{ > > + if (!__apic_test_and_set_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR)) > > + ++apic->isr_count; > > + BUG_ON(apic->isr_count > MAX_APIC_VECTOR); > > + if (likely(apic->isr_count == 1)) > > + apic->isr_cache = vec; > > + else > > + apic->isr_cache = -1; > > +} > > + > > +static inline void apic_clear_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic) > > +{ > > + if (__apic_test_and_clear_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR)) > > + --apic->isr_count; > > + BUG_ON(apic->isr_count < 0); > > + apic->isr_cache = -1; > > +} > > + > > int kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > { > > struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic; > > @@ -273,6 +312,10 @@ int kvm_apic_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq) > > static inline int apic_find_highest_isr(struct kvm_lapic *apic) > > { > > int result; > > + if (!apic->isr_count) > > + return -1; > > + if (likely(apic->isr_cache != -1)) > > assert(isr_count == 1). > > Looks fine otherwise. Gleb can you review please? I am not convinced we need to keep track of isr_count. isr_cache should be enough. Why setting isr_cache to -1 if isr_count > 1? Just overwrite isr_cache values with newly injected vector and use it on next EOI. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html