On 05/29/2012 04:47 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 12:26 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 05/29/2012 10:47 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Under what conditions would the kernel not support ioport access via sysfs? >> >> >> > >> > No clue. The oldest kernel I checked (2.6.16) does not contain traces it >> > would refuse to provide access. >> >> I guess this was added first, and sysfs support was added later >> (9ed83e8eb18b0). Alex, any idea what kernels would fail this? > > It's more recent than that. 8633328b is where we added pci-sysfs ioport > access, so 2.6.35 would be the first kernel with it. I don't really > know how this ever worked except for a very limited range of io ports > addresses before the sysfs access went in, so I'm ok with removing it. > Thanks, > Okay. Both patches applied, thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html