On 05/28/2012 04:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > If the kernel does not support ioport access via sysfs, passthrough can > only help if the unlikely case that a port <= 0x3ff is provided by the > device. So drop this to simplify the code and to allow dropping the > corresponding KVM infrastructure in preparation of upstream merge. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Does anyone recall the precise use case this was introduced for? It > exists since day #1, so commit logs do not help. At a wild guess, graphics device assignment. Under what conditions would the kernel not support ioport access via sysfs? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
