> -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:30 PM > To: Ren, Yongjie > Cc: Avi Kivity; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Liu, RongrongX > Subject: Re: Biweekly KVM Test report, kernel 51bfd299... qemu > a1fce560... > > Am 21.05.2012 11:45, schrieb Ren, Yongjie: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:05 PM > >> To: Avi Kivity > >> Cc: Ren, Yongjie; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: Biweekly KVM Test report, kernel 51bfd299... qemu > >> a1fce560... > >> > >> Am 21.05.2012 10:27, schrieb Avi Kivity: > >>> On 05/21/2012 06:34 AM, Ren, Yongjie wrote: > >>>> Hi All, > >>>> > >>>> This is KVM upstream test result against kvm.git > >> 51bfd2998113e1f8ce8dcf853407b76a04b5f2a0 based on kernel > 3.4.0-rc7, > >> and qemu-kvm.git a1fce560c0e5f287ed65d2aaadb3e59578aaa983. > >>>> > >>>> We found 1 new bug and 1 bug got fixed in the past two weeks. > >>>> > >>>> New issue (1): > >>>> 1. disk error when guest boot up via qcow2 image > >>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1002121 > >>>> -- Should be a regression on qemu-kvm. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Kevin, is this the known regression in qcow2 or something new? > >> > >> If the commit ID is right, it must be something new. The regression that > >> Marcelo found was fixed in 54e68143. > >> > > Yes, it's right. This should be a new regression. > > I looked at the comment of 54e68143, and found it was not related the > issue I reported. > > > >> The Launchpad bug refers to commit e54f008ef, which doesn't include > this > >> fix indeed. So was the test repeated with a more current qemu-kvm > >> version after filing the bug in Launchpad, or is the commit ID in this > >> mail wrong? > >> > > Latest commit 3fd9fedb in qemu-kvm master tree still has this issue. > > And, the commit ID provided in Launchpad is correct. > > Can you please check if the bug exists in upstream qemu.git as well? > This bug doesn't exist on upstream qemu.git with latest commit: fd4567d9. So, it should only exists on qemu-kvm tree. > In any case, it would be helpful to bisect the problem. > > Kevin ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
