> -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:05 PM > To: Avi Kivity > Cc: Ren, Yongjie; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Biweekly KVM Test report, kernel 51bfd299... qemu > a1fce560... > > Am 21.05.2012 10:27, schrieb Avi Kivity: > > On 05/21/2012 06:34 AM, Ren, Yongjie wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> This is KVM upstream test result against kvm.git > 51bfd2998113e1f8ce8dcf853407b76a04b5f2a0 based on kernel 3.4.0-rc7, > and qemu-kvm.git a1fce560c0e5f287ed65d2aaadb3e59578aaa983. > >> > >> We found 1 new bug and 1 bug got fixed in the past two weeks. > >> > >> New issue (1): > >> 1. disk error when guest boot up via qcow2 image > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1002121 > >> -- Should be a regression on qemu-kvm. > >> > > > > Kevin, is this the known regression in qcow2 or something new? > > If the commit ID is right, it must be something new. The regression that > Marcelo found was fixed in 54e68143. > Yes, it's right. This should be a new regression. I looked at the comment of 54e68143, and found it was not related the issue I reported. > The Launchpad bug refers to commit e54f008ef, which doesn't include this > fix indeed. So was the test repeated with a more current qemu-kvm > version after filing the bug in Launchpad, or is the commit ID in this > mail wrong? > Latest commit 3fd9fedb in qemu-kvm master tree still has this issue. And, the commit ID provided in Launchpad is correct. > If the bug does still exist in current master, it would be helpful to > bisect it. > > Kevin ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
