Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: implement KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/24/2012 03:47 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > btw, a better place might be in kvm_devel_ioctl_check_extension_generic().
>
> Possibly yes. Dont know if there are architecture specific reasons to use
> something different than KVM_MAX_VCPUS.

Okay, I'll fold the implementations unless something prevents it (unlikely).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux