On 04/24/2012 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-04-24 13:57, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 03/29/2012 09:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Currently, MSI messages can only be injected to in-kernel irqchips by > >> defining a corresponding IRQ route for each message. This is not only > >> unhandy if the MSI messages are generated "on the fly" by user space, > >> IRQ routes are a limited resource that user space has to manage > >> carefully. > >> > >> By providing a direct injection path, we can both avoid using up limited > >> resources and simplify the necessary steps for user land. > >> > >> > > > > Applied to queue (for 3.5). > > > > Thanks for your patience. > > Oops, that was now unexpectedly fast. I hope you don't mean the ~ 1 month timeframe for the whole thing. > Extending and slightly reformatting the API docs I noticed some > inconsistency. Will send fixes soon. Can you fold this into my patch, or > just apply it on top? > > Since it's just in queue, not next, will fold into parent patch. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html