On 04/11/2012 08:00 PM, Guido Winkelmann wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 17:25:12 schrieben Sie: >> On 04/11/2012 04:43 PM, Guido Winkelmann wrote: >>> Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 16:29:55 schrieben Sie: >>>> I'm not sure if this is the problem but I noticed that the second layer >>>> and >>>> the third layer have the same memory size (8G), how about trying to >>>> reduce >>>> the memory for the third layer ? >>> >>> I tried reducing the third layer to 1G. That didn't change anything. >> >> There is a patch for fixing nVMX in 3.4. >> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg68951.html >> you can try it . > > Should I use that patch on the host, or on the first virtualized layer, or on > both? (Compiling 3.4-rc2 for both for now... ) On the host (we refer to it as L0 by the way). Orit > > Guido -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
