Re: The way of mapping BIOS into the guest's address space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0800, Yang Bai wrote:
> >> And will seabios replace the present bios implement or co-exsit?
> 
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ideally we should get rid of our minibios completely and only have
> > seabios here instead.
> 
> No, no, they should co-exist. There's absolutely no reason to force
> people to use a BIOS to boot Linux.
> 

I meant run-time (ie in memory). I didn't mean substitude our minibios,
but rather have an ability to either run with compiled-in bios or with
seabios instead.

	Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux