Re: Pe: [PATCH v5 1/3] virtio-scsi: first version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/02/12 21:16, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Could someone please explain to me why you can't simply fix virtio-blk?
>
> I dont think that virtio-scsi will replace virtio-blk everywhere. For non-scsi
> block devices, image files or logical volumes virtio-blk seems to be the right
> approach, I think.
>
> > Or would virtio-blk maintainers give a reason why they're unwilling to
> > have it fixed?
>
> I dont consider virtio-blk broken. It just doesnt cover everything.

Although I'm not sure whether that helps here: since about a year
there is software present in the upstream kernel that allows to use
any block device or even a file as a SCSI device.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux