Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we need -no-kvm-pit and -no-kvm-pit-reinjection semantics?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Usability. Users should not have to care about individual tick-based
> clocks. They care about "my OS requires lost ticks compensation, yes or no".

Conceivably an OS may require lost ticks compensation depending on
boot options given to the OS telling it which clock sources to use.

However I like the idea of a global default, which you can set and all
the devices inherit it unless overridden in each device.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux