On 11 December 2011 22:12, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (Actually what would be clearest would be if the ioctl took the > (interrupt-target, interrupt-line-for-that-target, value-of-line) > tuple as three separate values rather than encoding two of them into > a single integer, but I assume there's a reason we can't have that.) Have you thought about how this encoding scheme would be extended when we move to using the VGIC and an in-kernel interrupt controller implementation, incidentally? I haven't really looked into that at all, but I assume that then QEMU is going to start having to tell the kernel it wants to deliver interrupt 35 to the GIC, and so on... -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
