On 11 December 2011 20:07, Christoffer Dall
<christofferdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, if it was just "irq & 1", then I hear you, but it would be "(irq
> >> cpu_idx) & 1" which I don't think is more clear.
Er, what? The fields are [31..1] CPU index and [0] irqtype,
right? So what you have now is:
vcpu_idx = irq_level->irq / 2;
irqtype = irq_level->irq % 2;
and the bitshifting equivalent is:
vcpu_idx = irq_level->irq >> 1;
irqtype = irq_level->irq & 1;
surely?
Shifting by the cpuindex is definitely wrong.
(Incidentally I fixed a bug in your QEMU-side code which wasn't
feeding this field to the kernel in the way it expects:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=qemu/qemu-linaro.git;a=commitdiff;h=2502ba067e795e48d346f9816fad45177ca64bca
Sorry, I should have posted that to the list. I'll do that now.)
-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
