On 02.12.2011 03:33, Alex,Shi wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:00 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit : >>>> percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them >>>> for further code clean up. >>>> >>>> And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better >>>> performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable() >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c | 12 ++++++------ >>>> net/socket.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Thanks ! >> >> Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this? > > Kaber, David: > I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a > favor? No objections from me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
