Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:00 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit :
> > > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
> > > for further code clean up.
> > > 
> > > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
> > > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c |   12 ++++++------
> > >  net/socket.c           |    4 ++--
> > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Thanks !
> 
> Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this? 

Kaber, David: 
I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a
favor? 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux