Re: [F.A.Q.] perf ABI backwards and forwards compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 13:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Also the self monitor stuff, perf-tool doesn't use that for obvious 
> > reasons.
> 
> Indeed, and that's PAPI's strong point.
> 
> We could try to utilize it via some clever LD_PRELOAD trickery?

Wouldn't be really meaningful, a perf-test case that covers it would be
much saner.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux