On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
The ABI design allows for that kind of flexible extensibility, and
it's one of its major advantages.
What we *cannot* protect against is you relying on obscure details of
the ABI [...]
Is there some documentation that clearly spells out which parts of the
perf syscall userspace ABI are "obscure" and thus presumably
changeable?
That's actually something the KVM and virtio folks have done a great job
with IMHO. Both ABIs are documented pretty extensively and the specs are
kept up to date.
I guess for perf ABI, "perf test" is the closest thing to a specification
so if your application is using something that's not covered by it, you
might be in trouble.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
