Am 07.11.2011 12:38, schrieb Pekka Enberg: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Makes it a lot less hackable for me unless you want to restrict the set >> of potential developers to Linux kernel developers... > > We're not restricting potential developers to Linux kernel folks. We're > making it easy for them because we believe that the KVM tool is a > userspace component that requires the kind of low-level knowledge Linux > kernel developers have. > > I think you're looking at the KVM tool with your QEMU glasses on without > realizing that there's no point in comparing the two: we only support > Linux on Linux and we avoid hardware emulation as much as possible. So > what makes sense for QEMU, doesn't necessarily translate to the KVM tool > project. I'm not comparing anything. I'm not even referring to the virtualization functionality of it. It could be doing anything else and it wouldn't make a difference. For KVM tool I am not much more than a mere user. Trying it out was tedious for me, as it is for anyone else who isn't a kernel developer. That's all I'm saying. Making things easier for some kernel developers but ignoring that at the same time it makes things harder for users I consider a not so clever move. Just wanted to point that out; feel free to ignore it, your priorities are probably different. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
