On 11/06/2011 02:14 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> People seem to think the KVM tool is only about solving a specific > >> problem to kernel developers. That's certainly never been my goal as I > >> do lots of userspace programming as well. The end game for me is to > >> replace QEMU/VirtualBox for Linux on Linux virtualization for my day to > >> day purposes. > > > > Maybe it should be in tools/pekka then. Usually subsystems that want to > > be merged into Linux have broaded audiences though. > > I think you completely missed my point. > > I'm simply saying that KVM tool was never about solving a narrow > problem Alexander's script is trying to solve. That's why I feel it's > such a pointless exercise. But from your description, you're trying to solve just another narrow problem: "The end game for me is to replace QEMU/VirtualBox for Linux on Linux virtualization for my day to day purposes. " We rarely merge a subsystem to solve one person's problem (esp. when it is defined as "replace another freely available project", even if you dislike its command line syntax). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
