On 11/07/2011 11:30 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> In Linux we don't have that culture. No tool (except perf) lives in the > kernel repo. I fail to see why kvm-tool is that much different from > udev, util-linux, iproute, filesystem tools, that it should be included. tools/power was merged in just 2 versions ago, do you think that merging that was a mistake?
Indeed I do not see any advantage, since all the interfaces they use are stable anyway (sysfs, msr.ko).
If they had gone in x86info, for example, my distro (F16, not exactly conservative) would have likely picked those tools up already, but it didn't.
Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html