On 10/17/2011 06:37 PM, Jorge Lucangeli Obes wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/17/2011 08:10 AM, Jorge Lucangeli Obes wrote: > >> > What do top/vmstat/kvm_stat say? > >> > >> I'm attaching the output of the three commands during a test run > >> launched form inside the chroot, which was slow as usual. I didn't see > >> anything too weird on top/vmstat, though I found it odd that once the > >> VM had booted Chromium OS, QEMU still ate 100% of one core. vmstat > >> didn't show anything strange, QEMU taking up the memory it's supposed > >> to. What I don't quite know how to interpret is the output of > >> kvm_stat, hence the attachment. > >> > >> > > > > kvm_stat shows insane instruction emulation counts. Please post a trace > > as described in http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing. > > I've uploaded a bzip'd trace here: > > https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B78o7gMWkuFeMzM3MWM5NmUtYTY3My00ZDkxLTljZmUtYjRhMWRhOWVjZTZh&hl=en_US > > Almost all the exits show "[FAILED TO PARSE]", would this be a problem? > Did you 'make install' trace-cmd? run it from outside the chroot. You're showing be a trace of the boot process, please start the trace after the guest is idle (but consuming lots of cpu). What host kernel version are you running? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
