RE: Biweekly KVM Test report, kernel 1e0e12af... qemu ad305c9f...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcelo Tosatti [mailto:mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:30 AM
> To: Ren, Yongjie
> Cc: KVM General
> Subject: Re: Biweekly KVM Test report, kernel 1e0e12af... qemu ad305c9f...
> 
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:28:36PM +0800, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > This is KVM test result against kvm.git
> 1e0e12af7606a7d4063654eb294c8fd554c71a25 based on kernel 3.1.0-rc5+,
> and qemu.git ad305c9fc6f2c037f47b3274ceace4ebc81160ed.
> >
> > We found 2 new bugs during the past two weeks. Both of them are
> qemu bugs.
> > One of them is that guest boot up too slowly.
> > The other is that 64-bit windows guest cannot boot up.
> > We found no bugs got fixed.
> >
> > New issues:
> > 1. guest boots up too slowly
> >  https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/855633
> > 2. 64-bit windows guest cannot boot up
> >  https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/855664
> 
> This is probably due to default memory/queue branch being used
> instead of master?
yes, I'm sorry. The master tree doesn't have these two bugs, and I'll mark the bugs as invalid. I used the default 'memory/queue' branch when I sent out the report.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux