Re: kvm PCI assignment & VFIO ramblings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



eOn Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:17:05PM -0700, Aaron Fabbri wrote:
[snip]
> Yes.  In essence, I'd rather not have to run any other admin processes.
> Doing things programmatically, on the fly, from each process, is the
> cleanest model right now.

The "persistent group" model doesn't necessarily prevent that.
There's no reason your program can't use the administrative interface
as well as the "use" interface, and I don't see that making the admin
interface separate and persistent makes this any harder.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux